Skip to main content

APTA is deeply concerned that the U.S. Department of Education failed to meaningfully consider thousands of public comments outlining strong policy arguments against its proposed rule and clear evidence that the doctor of physical therapy degree meets the federal definition of a professional degree in finalizing its latest rule. This rule will significantly restrict borrowing for future students pursuing a DPT degree at a time of nationwide health care workforce shortages and rising demand for physical therapist services.

The department's policy change undermines the future workforce and risks limiting patient access to care, as APTA detailed in its Nov. 24, 2025, statement when the department's Reimagining and Improving Student Education, or RISE, Negotiated Rulemaking Committee recommended the proposal.

"APTA supports meaningful reforms to lower tuition costs and make education more affordable; however, federal student loans remain essential to ensuring access to a physical therapist education," said APTA President Kyle Covington, PT, DPT, PhD.

"The Department of Education's final rule restricting federal student loan access puts unnecessary barriers between future physical therapists and the education they need to serve their communities," he said. "APTA opposes this rule because it undermines student access to federal loans, threatens the stability of the health care workforce, and ultimately risks patient access to care."

How the Final Rule Redefines "Professional Degree" and Cuts Loan Eligibility

Under the final rule issued April 30, the department finalized an arbitrary and limited definition of "professional degree" solely for the purpose of determining eligibility for higher federal loan limits. The department finalized its approach to reserve the highest annual and lifetime loan caps of $50,000 per year and $200,000 total only for 11 degree programs it categorized as "professional" for student loan purposes: theology, pharmacy, dentistry, veterinary medicine, chiropractic, law, medicine, optometry, osteopathic medicine, podiatry, and clinical psychology.

All other programs, including DPT programs, are categorized as "graduate degrees" and subject to significantly lower caps of $20,500 per year and $100,000 total. While the department acknowledges these are solely internal classifications and not a judgment of a program's professional standing, the practical effect is clear: many DPT students will face federal borrowing limits that do not align with the real cost of education and the cost of living during full-time clinical training.

How the Final Rule Affects DPT Students and Access to Education

While APTA supports reforms to lower tuition costs and make education more affordable, federal student loans are essential to ensuring access to DPT education. By restricting federal loan availability, the final rule may push students toward higher-cost private debt or deter qualified applicants entirely. Such an outcome would disproportionately affect students from underserved and underrepresented backgrounds and further destabilize the future of the physical therapy workforce.

APTA Advocacy: Comments, Coalition Action, and Ongoing Opposition

In its formal comments to the Department of Education, submitted March 2 on the department's proposed rule, APTA made clear that the doctor of physical therapy degree already met the federal definition of a professional degree and should be treated accordingly. During the proposed rulemaking period, APTA led a national, coordinated advocacy campaign to protect students, the profession, and patient access to care.

APTA strongly opposes the department's final decision and is continuing its advocacy to protect prospective students and the profession. The association will continue engaging policymakers and agency officials, working with partners as a steering committee member of the Advanced Professional Workforce Alliance, and closely monitoring the rule's implementation. Litigation challenging the final rule is expected, and APTA is tracking developments as multiple entities evaluate legal options.

Concurrently, APTA supports three bipartisan legislative solutions already introduced in Congress: H.R. 6574 (Rep. Timothy Kennedy, D-N.Y.), H.R. 6677/S. 4039 (Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y. / Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md.), and H.R. 6718 (Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y.). While these bills share a common theme of modifying borrowing caps, they differ in scope and approach. Specifically, the bills would ensure that professional degrees, such as the DPT, are classified and/or have access to the professional degree loan caps. In doing so, they would protect prospective students' ability to pursue careers in physical therapy and other essential health care professions.

What Happens Next: Take Action to Help Drive Congressional Action

APTA urges all physical therapy advocates to use the APTA Patient Action Center to tell your members of Congress to support APTA-backed legislation addressing the final rule's restrictive federal student loan caps. Member engagement is essential to protecting students' access to education, supporting a strong workforce, and ensuring patients can receive timely, high-quality care.

APTA members are also encouraged to join the APTA Advocacy Network to stay informed on the latest updates.


You Might Also Like...

News

APTA Continues Fighting For Federal Student Loan Access for Future PTs

Apr 1, 2026

The American Physical Therapy Association continues its advocacy against the U.S. Department of Education's proposal that would sharply limit federal student

News

Rural Health Care Workforce Shortages Highlighted in Congressional Hearing

Feb 25, 2026

This week, the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health, through which most legislation affecting Medicare and Medicaid passes, held a hearing titled

Resource

APTA State Advocacy Map

Feb 9, 2026

Members can seamlessly navigate through the widget map to discern whether a state chapter supports, opposes, or is neutral on a bill.